最近想要找英文補習班,但是我發現到很多都是浪費錢學英文

常常到了公司要我開英文會議時,就發現到我英文補習班英文程度很差,到英文補習班學的全都白費了

後來我才發現,是我選擇的英文補習班錯了,大多會教口說的的英文補習班,都是在這邊學的。

同事報名過後也讓英文程度突飛猛進,真的如果我早知道,我也跟他一起去補這家了!

還有哪些英文補習班呢?


推薦你試聽可能會改變你一生的英文課:

課程量身訂做 完美符合個人需要

加入TutorABC,真的能解決我所有的英文學習需求!比方我想加強字彙量,就會為我安排字彙課,而且外籍顧問會耐心教導每個單字不同的用法,也會鼓勵我多說多使用,這是一般補習班做不到的!TutorABC也會替我安排不同國家的顧問,上課不只是學習到世界各地口音和用法,就連文化也接觸到了!

時間自由安排 從容兼顧工作家庭

TutorABC的另一個優點,就是課程時間非常自由。我在辦公室或在家都能學英文,讓我可以放心兼顧工作和家庭。而且兒子看到我學英文的樣子也躍躍欲試,於是我為小一的他報名了TutorABCJr英文課,現在他也能對著外籍顧問侃侃而談,無意中成為兒子的學習模範,是我很開心的一點!

能力輕鬆維持 全英文環境免出國

現在我的英文已經能完全應付工作需要,面對世界各國的客戶也能順利溝通。每天利用一點時間做練習,只要45分鐘,上課像聊天一樣輕鬆,就能幫助我維持英文能力!在TutorABC不只是語言上的學習,也會培養國際觀,在TutorABC學英文真的很棒!

TutorABC讓您用對的方式學英文!

240萬人親身見證!學好英文不困難!加薪升遷只是當然!

一起來看看Lucas在TutorABC上課前與上課後的差異吧!

Lucas上課前的英文

Lucas上課後的英文





About LIM Advisors

  • LIM believes that the recent and proposed new enhancements from the RE are broadly welcome but that they will again not significantly reduce the discount on AGF units


  • In August, AMP Capital hired Goldman Sachs to advise them on a strategic review of the fund and in October, they announced a number of strategic enhancements in order to address the discount revealing that their discount reference point was 15%. They asked unitholders to give these enhancements six months to work (i.e. to 31 March 2016) and stated that they would then hold an internal Fit for Purpose review to consider the effectiveness of their enhancements.



  • LIM is concerned that the RE has significant conflicts of interest affecting its obligations towards AGF and, as it no longer intends to offer unitholders a vote on the renewal of the 10-year investment management contract with its affiliate, AMP Capital, believes that unitholders should be able to vote on the future of the fund


  • LIM believes the discount to Net Tangible Assets (NTA) on the units of the AMP Capital China Growth Fund (AGF) remains unacceptable and calls on the Responsible Entity (RE) to allow unitholders to decide on its future


  • LIM Advisors Portfolio Manager Nick Paris did not believe that these changes would be sufficient and called an AGF unitholder meeting (an "EGM") in October 2015 seeking to change the fund's constitution to impose a 10% discount ceiling on AGF.

    Background

    LIM Advisors which currently owns 9.98% of the outstanding units in AGF wrote to AMP Capital in July 2015 asking it to address the discount on AGF units as this was too high having averaged 20% since the fund launched in December 2006.











    AMP Capital has now concluded its review, announcing on 20 May 2016 that the fund was 'Fit for Purpose' but that a number of new enhancements would be proposed. However, there was only a brief reference to the AMP's own target discount of 15% and no reference at all to LIM's 10% discount ceiling.

    "This 20% discount between the market value of units and the actual asset backing of the units represents a massive value loss to all AGF unitholders and it is clear that AMP's enhancements have not worked sufficiently to reduce the significant discount."





    "Importantly, the discount during the recent six month review period has been 20% too and it is therefore unchanged and significantly above AMP's 15% target and LIM's皇城街英文補習班推薦 10% ceiling and this is not acceptable to unitholders," Mr Paris said.

    Unitholders to decide AGF's future at an end July EGM

    LIM Advisors Limited is an Asia-Pacific-focused multi strategy investment group, founded in 1995 by George W. Long, originally under the name Long Investment Management Limited ("LIM"). LIM is based in Hong Kong and has wide regional coverage, with additional research offices in Tokyo, Beijing and London. LIM has extensive investment expertise across the region and has been investing in credit and equities since the firm's inception.



    According to LIM, the AGF discount is caused by the fund's failure to outperform its Chinese A share benchmark and by a lack of sufficient demand in its chosen market of Australia for Chinese A share exposure.

    AGF is an ASX-listed fund investing in Chinese A shares which is managed by AMP. On 10 June 2016, it had an NTA of A$472m, a market capitalisation of A$382m and its units traded at a 19% discount.

    建功南十七巷英文補習班推薦



    Mr Paris said that it was LIM's view that AGF is not 'Fit for Purpose' because it has under-performed its benchmark index since launch and because the average discount on AGF units since launch has been an unacceptable 20%.

    "As a result we have requested that the RE add a resolution at the July meeting that AGF be wound up," Mr Paris said.



    In August 2015, LIM asked AMP to change its investment process in order to improve performance but this request was ignored. This change is now being proposed by AMP more than 10 months later although it may take some time for any benefits of this change to be seen. AMP are also now proposing a redemption offer to buy back up to 15% of outstanding AGF units at a price of NTA less redemption costs plus an on-market unit buyback of up to 5% of units over a 12 month period.

    "In short, the fund has been too large for the available demand for it. AGF therefore nee軍福一路英文補習班推薦ds to redeem outstanding units in order to re-size itself to match the available demand," Mr Paris said.

    "We believe that AMP Capital should introduce a redemption offer of unrestricted size in order to buyback units at their NTA less redemption costs as we believe that all unitholders should have the ability to sell their units at close to the current A$1.00 net asset value of each unit which is significantly higher than their current A$0.81 market price," Mr Paris said.

    "This is another example of the weak corporate governance surrounding the way that this fund is run as there is little independent oversight on our RE.

    Resolving the AGF discount

    SYDNEY, June 15, 2016 /PRNewswire/ --





    Discount closing initiatives ineffective



    On 20 May 2016 AMP announced eight new enhancements to the fund including proposing a change to the investment mandate to improve the investment return potential of AGF.



    "Whilst we broadly agree with these new enhancements, in our opinion they will again not be sufficient to reduce the fund's discount," Mr Paris said.



    "We accept that this request places AMP Capital in a position of conflict as any redemption would necessarily reduce the number of units on issue and therefore reduce the management fees payable to the AMP Group. These totalled A$10.6m in calendar year 2015."



    Result of the recent Fit for Purpose review



    AMP has committed to holding an EGM of unitholders at the end of July and to publishing the Notice of Meeting in late June. They will then be seeking unitholder endorsement for their actions since October as well as their recent new enhancements.



    LIM does not believe that the past and proposed new enhancements from the RE will significantly reduce the discount on AGF units. It is also concerned that statements in recent Annual Reports to unitholders that the RE would ask unitholders to vote on extending the existing Investment Management contract for its affiliate AMP Capital when its 10 year contract expires in November 2016 are now being ignored.



    "The RE has now proposed an alternative way of re-engaging AMP Capital to manage the fund without needing unitholders to vote on it, LIM thinks that AMP does not want unitholders to have the chance to hold AMP Capital to account for its sub-index performance and the large discount since the fund launched," Mr Paris said.



  • LIM believes that AGF is not 'Fit for Purpose' despite the decision of the RE because it has under-performed its benchmark index since launch and because the average discount on AGF units since launch has been an unacceptable 20%


  • LIM has therefore requested that the RE add a resolution to the July unitholder meeting that AGF be wound up


  • "We believe that AGF unitholders should have the chance to review the success of the fund now that it is close to 10 years old.

    "We received significant support from other AGF unitholders for this action. However, we were persuaded by the RE to cancel that meeting and wait for the enhancements to work on the basis they would then call a unitholder meeting in July 2016, at which unitholders could review the effectiveness of the initiatives," Mr Paris said.





    arrow
    arrow

      marioed2a8as 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()